Rated as OPINION  |  Add Comment  |  Report This

yes

Rated as OPINION  |  Add Comment  |  Report This

The goal of the united nations org. is/was established to make, (The World,) one country. Could one say they are in the process of doing that? Although the goal has not as yet been attained, the strict answer to the question is clearly, YES. For instance, in its ?Millennium Declaration? of 2000, the United Nations General Assembly made this solemn resolve: ?We will spare no effort to free our peoples from the scourge of war, whether within or between States, which has claimed more than 5 million lives in the past decade.? Such proclamations have won the UN praise and admiration from many quarters, as well as the 2001 Nobel Peace Prize. In thus honoring the UN, the Norwegian Nobel Committee stated that ?the only negotiable route to global peace and cooperation goes by way of the United Nations.?

The real question is "Will the U.N. bring peace to the world?" The answer to that is clearly No! For example
From its very inception, the United Nations organization has been interested in children and their problems. At the end of 1946, it established the United Nations International Children?s Emergency Fund (UNICEF) as a temporary measure to care for children in areas devastated by war.

In 1953 this emergency fund was turned into a permanent organization. Although it is now officially known as the United Nations Children?s Fund, it retained its original acronym, UNICEF. Thus, for over half a century, UNICEF has been providing children throughout the world with food, clothing, and medical care and has been trying to look after children?s needs in general.

The needs of children were given greater prominence in 1959 when the United Nations adopted a Declaration of the Rights of the Child. It was hoped that this document would generate interest in the problems of children and would help solve them by encouraging public support, financial and otherwise.

But ?twenty years later,? according to Collier?s 1980 Year Book, ?these ?rights??especially those relating to nutrition, health, and material well-being?were still largely unrealized by many of the world?s 1.5 billion children.? So in recognition of the continuing need to solve the problems of children and in accord with its declared goals, the United Nations designated 1979 the International Year of the Child. Government, civic, religious, and charitable groups all over the world were quick to respond to the search for solutions.

Was It All Just a ?Cruel Joke??

Sad to say, according to a UNICEF report, children in developing nations did not fare well during the International Year of the Child. At year?s end, some 200 million of them were still malnourished, and half the deaths of the 15 million who died under the age of five could be attributed to malnutrition. Of the 100 children born each minute that year in those countries, 15 would be dead before the end of their first year. Fewer than 40 percent would finish elementary school. Commenting on the UNICEF report, an editorial in the Indian Express newspaper complained that the Year of the Child turned out to be a ?cruel joke.?

Some individuals foresaw this failure. For example, at the very beginning of the year, Fabrizio Dentice wrote in the magazine L?Espresso: ?Something more than the Year of the Child is needed to remedy the situation.? The magazine commented: ?Today?s life-style makes us what we are, and this is what needs changing.?

In the ongoing search for solutions to the problems of children, a world summit was held at UN headquarters in September 1990. It was one of the largest meetings of world leaders in history. Over 70 government leaders were present. The gathering was a follow-up to the Convention on the Rights of the Child, which was adopted on November 20, 1989, and went into force on September 2, 1990. By the end of that month, the agreement had already been ratified by 39 nations.

?The Convention,? UNICEF recently noted, ?has rapidly become the most widely accepted human rights treaty ever, creating a global momentum for children.? Indeed, as of November 1999, the Convention had been adopted by 191 nations. UNICEF boasted: ?More progress was made in realizing and protecting children?s rights in the decade following adoption of the Convention on the Rights of the Child than in any other comparable period in human history.?

Despite this progress, German President Johannes Rau was moved to comment: ?It is sad that in our time we still have to be reminded that children have rights.? Or to be reminded that they still have serious problems! Admitting in November 1999 that ?much remains to be done,? UNICEF explained: ?Globally, an estimated 12 million children under the age of five die every year, mostly of easily preventable causes. Some 130 million children in developing countries are not in primary school . . . About 160 million children are severely or moderately malnourished. . . . Many unwanted children languish in orphanages and other institutions, denied education and adequate health care. These children are often physically abused. An estimated 250 million children are engaged in some form of labour.? Mention was also made of the 600 million children living in absolute poverty and the 13 million who will have lost at least one parent to AIDS by the end of 2000. And now six years later and Sixty years after UNICEF started! What is better? Has the United Nations organization made this world a safer place to live? You dear reader, can answer that for yourself. (Jeremiah 10:23-24) 23 I well know, O Jehovah, that to earthling man his way does not belong. It does not belong to man who is walking even to direct his step.
For a postage paid free copy of the book "What Does The Bible Really Teach" please write me at
Coeburn Va. 24230-1684

Comments

larryhyder
commented 2 years 11 months ago

 Add Comment Report This

If you don't think the U.N. is doing just what I said they are doing, Perhaps it's time for you to start at least watching the news on tv. larry

Rated as OPINION  |  Add Comment  |  Report This

No, this would cause diruption to the world we can't merge, I am very happy living in the united states, and if we merge there could be major civil wars on laws currency, and population!

Rated as OPINION  |  Add Comment  |  Report This

I dont think the canadians would let bush do that, they seem to have some sense! Besides there are to many politcal issues. America doesnt have the same rules in some different states, never mind a whole super country.

Rated as OPINION  |  Add Comment  |  Report This

Sure why not. And would you like fries with that ?